Faber v. USA

Faber v. USA

Petitioner:	Deborah Faber
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	5:2010cv04095
Filed:	October 18, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office:	Western Division Office
County:	Woodbury
Presiding Judge:	Linda R Reade
Presiding Judge:	Paul A Zoss
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2013	Filing 8 ORDER re 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255)(Criminal Case No. 08-cr-4060) filed by Deborah Faber: The court finds all of themovants assertions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to be without merit. Accordingly, the movants moti on to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 2255 denied. Lastly, the court does not believe that appellate review of the movants claims is warranted, and, therefore, a certificate ofappealability is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 3/13/13. (ksy)(Copy w/NEF to PLF)
October 27, 2010	Filing 2 ORDER re 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Deborah Faber: The government is directed to file either an answer or an appropriate motion by no later than 11/26/2010. If the government elects to file an answer, the mov ant may reply by no later than 12/10/10. In the event that an answer is filed by the government, the court will establish by subsequent order a briefing schedule. (See order text) Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 10/27/10. (Copy w/NEF to Plf) (ksy)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2013

Filing 8 ORDER re 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255)(Criminal Case No. 08-cr-4060) filed by Deborah Faber: The court finds all of themovants assertions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to be without merit. Accordingly, the movants moti on to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 2255 denied. Lastly, the court does not believe that appellate review of the movants claims is warranted, and, therefore, a certificate ofappealability is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 3/13/13. (ksy)(Copy w/NEF to PLF)

October 27, 2010

Filing 2 ORDER re 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Deborah Faber: The government is directed to file either an answer or an appropriate motion by no later than 11/26/2010. If the government elects to file an answer, the mov ant may reply by no later than 12/10/10. In the event that an answer is filed by the government, the court will establish by subsequent order a briefing schedule. (See order text) Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 10/27/10. (Copy w/NEF to Plf) (ksy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faber v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	John H Lammers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Deborah Faber
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?