Alvarez-Santos v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Iowa Northern District Alvarez-Santos v. United States of America

Alvarez-Santos v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Lorenzo Alvarez-Santos
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	5:2013cv04051
Filed:	June 11, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office:	Western Division Office
County:	Woodbury
Presiding Judge:	Mark W Bennett
Presiding Judge:	Leonard T Strand
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 7, 2014	Filing 19 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 4 Motion To Dismiss 3 Petitioner's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 (CR11-4049 MWB). This action is dismissed with prejudice as untimely under 28 U.S.C. section 2255(f). Judgment shall issue accordingly and no certificate of appealability will issue. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 05/07/2014. Order/NEF mailed to pro se filer. (src)
June 11, 2013	Filing 2 ORDER granting 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lorenzo Alvarez-Santos. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the attached Motion to Vacate Sentence and Judgment Pursuant to 28 USC Section 2255. The Clerk of Court is also directed to appoint counsel to represent petitioner Alvarez-Santos on his Motion to Vacate Sentence. The prosecution is directed to file either an answer or an appropriate motion on or before 8/12/13. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 6/11/13. (copy w/nef mailed to non-ECF filer; CJA Panel Administrator notified) (djs)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 7, 2014

Filing 19 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 4 Motion To Dismiss 3 Petitioner's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 (CR11-4049 MWB). This action is dismissed with prejudice as untimely under 28 U.S.C. section 2255(f). Judgment shall issue accordingly and no certificate of appealability will issue. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 05/07/2014. Order/NEF mailed to pro se filer. (src)

June 11, 2013

Filing 2 ORDER granting 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lorenzo Alvarez-Santos. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the attached Motion to Vacate Sentence and Judgment Pursuant to 28 USC Section 2255. The Clerk of Court is also directed to appoint counsel to represent petitioner Alvarez-Santos on his Motion to Vacate Sentence. The prosecution is directed to file either an answer or an appropriate motion on or before 8/12/13. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 6/11/13. (copy w/nef mailed to non-ECF filer; CJA Panel Administrator notified) (djs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarez-Santos v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Shawn Stephen Wehde
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Lorenzo Alvarez-Santos
Represented By:	Lynn M Rose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?