Daniels v. City of Sioux City et al
Plaintiff: DaCosta Daniels
Defendant: Joshua Tyler, City of Sioux City and Sioux City Community School District
Case Number: 5:2013cv04068
Filed: July 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Western Division Office
County: Woodbury
Presiding Judge: Mark W Bennett
Presiding Judge: Leonard T Strand
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting 50 PRO SE Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis and denying in its entirety 54 Plaintiff's Pro Se Appeal of Bill of Costs, which I have construed, in the first instance, as a request for review by the district court of the 49 Bill of Costs. The taxing of costs in the amount of $1,188.15 against the plaintiff and to the defendant is reversed, and an award of costs is denied in its entirety. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 12/23/14. (copy w/nef mailed to pro se plaintiff) (djs)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying without prejudice 25 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Disclosure of Expert Witness and granting 26 MOTION for Extension of Time for Expert Disclosures. Plaintiffs Expert Witness due by 3/31/2014. Defendants Expert Witnesses due by 5/30/2014. Plaintiffs Rebuttal Experts due by 6/30/2014. Discovery due by 8/1/2014. Motions due by 9/2/2014. Trial Ready Deadline 1/5/2015. All other dates and deadlines in this case, including the trial date of 1/12/15, remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leonard T Strand on 3/4/14. (djs)
November 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order granting 14 Motion to Dismiss and the claims against Defendant Sioux City Community School District are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 11/08/2013. (des)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniels v. City of Sioux City et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Tyler
Represented By: Douglas L Phillips
Represented By: Deena Ann Townley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Sioux City
Represented By: Douglas L Phillips
Represented By: Deena Ann Townley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sioux City Community School District
Represented By: Douglas L Phillips
Represented By: Deena Ann Townley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DaCosta Daniels
Represented By: Tod J Deck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?