Clark et al v. CCUSO Nursing Staff et al
| People at CCUSO That Has Asthma, Harold Johnson and Andrew Clark |
| CCUSO Nursing Staff, Mary Benson, Jason Smith and Brad Wittrock |
| 5:2013cv04076 |
| August 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Western Division Office |
| Cherokee |
| Donald E OBrien |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER granting 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Harold Johnson and 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Andrew Clark. The Clerk of Court shall file and serve the Plaintiffs Complaint by certified mail according to the attached service forms. No filing fee will be assessed. Plaintiff People at CCUSO that has Asthma is dismissed from the case. Defendant CCUSO Nursing Staff is dismissed. Plaintiffs 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel is g ranted. The Court hereby appoints attorney Robert Tiefenthaler under Library Fund Administrative Order No. 13-AO-0009. Appointed counsel will file an Amended Complaint by 12/15/2013. Signed by Senior Judge Donald E OBrien on 10/31/13. (copy w/nef mailed to Plaintiff; copy to CR Financial; copy w/Complaint sent by certified mail to Defendants and Gretchen Witte Kraemer) (djs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
