Roth et al v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, The
| Mary E Roth, Michael A Roth, Anna M Roth and Bradley E Roth |
| Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, The |
| 5:2015cv04074 |
| September 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Western Division Office |
| Lyon |
| Mark W Bennett |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion For Order Confirming Arbitration Decision and Directing Entry of Judgment Thereon by The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society and denying 49 Motion to Enter Order Confirming Arbitration Decision and Directing Entry of Judgment. Summary judgment is rendered in favor of defendant as to Count IV. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in defendants favor as to all counts. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 05/14/2019. (jjh)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order granting 6 Combined Motion To Dismiss Or Stay The Proceedings And To Compel Arbitration to the extent the parties are ordered to arbitration and the proceedings in this court are stayed pending questions certified to the Iowa Supreme Court (See Order Text). Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 12/4/2015. (certified to Iowa Supreme Court) (des)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
