Lee v. Rollinger et al

Plaintiff: Treva Lee
Defendant: Richard Rollinger and BNSF Railway Company
Thirdparty_defendant: Wayne Comstock and Charlene A Kelly
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Richard Rollinger and BNSF Railway Company
Case Number: 5:2016cv04126
Filed: November 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Western Division Office
County: Woodbury
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Referring Judge: CJ Williams
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER: Paragraphs 1, 3 and 6-8 of Plaintiffs 52 Motion in Limine are overruled and Paragraphs 2 and 5 are sustained. The court reserves ruling on Paragraph 4, as the parties agreed to work towards a joint stipulation on this issue. The 54 Fed.R. Evid. 609 Motion is granted. SubparagraphsA-H and J-L of Defendants 55 Motion in Limine are sustained and Subparagraph I is overruled. The 76 Motion to Strike is granted. The 77 Motion to Exclude is granted (see text of Order). Signed by Judge Linda R Reade on 4/1/2019. (skm)
November 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER denying 39 Motion to Amend/Correct 3 State Court Petition by Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge CJ Williams on 11/14/2017. (jjh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Rollinger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Treva Lee
Represented By: James Matthew Carlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Rollinger
Represented By: Michael W Thrall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: Michael W Thrall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_defendant: Wayne Comstock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_defendant: Charlene A Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Richard Rollinger
Represented By: Michael W Thrall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_plaintiff: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: Michael W Thrall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?