MCI Communications Services Inc v. Rognes Corp, et al
| MCI Communications Services Inc |
| RTS, LLC, Rognes Corp and Cody Rognes |
| 5:2018cv04089 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Kelly Mahoney |
| CJ Williams |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to RTS, LLC, Cody Rognes, Rognes Corp. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Packet) (pac) |
| Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Kelly Mahoney added (conflicts list reviewed; none found). (pac) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by MCI Communications Services Inc identifying Corporate Parent Verizon Business Network Services Inc., Corporate Parent Verizon Business Global LLC, Corporate Parent Verizon Communications Inc., Corporate Parent MCI Broadband Solutions Inc, Corporate Parent Terramark Worldwide Inc, Corporate Parent MCI Communications Corporation for MCI Communications Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Attachment 1 to Corporate Disclosure) (Campbell, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0862-2807665.), filed by MCI Communications Services Inc. Scheduling Report due by 1/31/2019 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Campbell, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
