Lilly v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Stephen C. Lilly and Stephen C Lilly |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2019cv04065 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| CJ Williams |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob A Schunk on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Schunk, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 New Case Packet) (jjh) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Stephen C. Lilly. Dismissal Deadline 1/13/2020 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjh) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff. The clerk is ordered to file the complaint and summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts on 10/1/2019. (jjh)
|
| Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added (no conflicts identified). (pac) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen C. Lilly (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kappelman, Wes) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
