Matthews v. Campbell
Brion Ross Matthews |
Woodbury County Attorney and Mark Campbell |
5:2020cv04047 |
September 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Mark A Roberts |
Leonard T Strand |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER of Dismissal. No action was taken in this case within the time provided in the Court's Order #3 dated October 20, 2020. Signed by Clerk on 11/4/2020. (Copy w/NEF to Plf) (jag) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Dismissal Pursuant to Local Rule 41(a)(4)and 41(c). Unless appropriate action is taken by 11/3/2020, this action will be dismissed. Signed by Clerk on 10/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 41) (Copy w/NEF to Plf) (jag) |
Filing 2 ORDER re #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Brion Ross Matthews: Plaintiff given thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If plaintiff does not file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days, this case will be dismissed with no further order of the court. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 9/18/2020. (order and IFP form mailed to pltf) (jjh) |
Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brion Ross Matthews (Attachments: #1 1983 Complaint) (ksy)(NEF to Plf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.