Muecke v. United States of America
Petitioner: Adam Muecke
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 5:2022cv04053
Filed: October 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Judge Kelly KE Mahoney
Referring Judge: Leonard T Strand
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2022 Filing 8 MAIL Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Adam Muecke which included #3 Reply and #4 Amended Reply. Mail sent to updated address on docket. (skm)
October 25, 2022 FEE Receipt: $5.00, receipt number 196 for Filing Fee pursuant to #2 Order (JLH)
October 24, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S Judgment in favor of United States of America against Adam Muecke. Plaintiff take nothing and this action is dismissed Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2022. (Judgment/NEF mailed to Pet) (klh)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying as moot #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Adam Muecke. Pursuant to information contained in #5 Governments Response. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 10/24/2022. (Copy to Pet) (klh) Modified on 10/25/2022 (klh).
October 24, 2022 Filing 5 RESPONSE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Second Amended Reply by United States of America (Fairchild, Forde)
October 21, 2022 Filing 4 RESPONSE/REPLY by United States of America re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Amended (Fairchild, Forde) Mailed to petitioner on 10/24/2022 (pac).
October 21, 2022 Filing 3 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by United States of America. (Filed by Clerk's Office with approval from LTS chambers) (pac) Mailed to petitioner on 10/24/2022 (pac).
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Adam Muecke: The Clerk's office is directed to term Doc. 50 (20cr4029-LTS-KEM) as a motion and refile it, along with this order, as a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Government is directed to respond to the petition, both regarding its merits and any exhaustion issues, within seven(7) days from the date of this order. Muecke will be given 14 days from the date of this order to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma paupers. The Clerk's office is directed to send Muecke the standard in forma pauperis form. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 10/13/2022. (ksy)(copy w/ IFP form to Pet)
October 13, 2022 Filing 1 PRO SE PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Adam Muecke. Dismissal Deadline 1/24/2023 (ksy)(NEF to Pet) (PSLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muecke v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Adam Muecke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Forde Fairchild
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?