Reliance Telephone of Grand Forks, Inc et al v. O'Brien County, Iowa
| Reliance Telephone of Grand Forks, Inc and Reliance Systems, Inc |
| O'Brien County, Iowa |
| 5:2022cv04055 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| CJ Williams |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by O'Brien County, Iowa. (Phillips, Douglas) |
| Filing 15 BRIEF in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Reliance Systems, Inc, Reliance Telephone of Grand Forks, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit) (Sealey, Patrick) |
| Filing 14 *TEXT ORDER* granting #13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Alan M. Anderson: Upon review of the motion and certificate of good standing, the court finds the motion should be granted, on the condition Attorney Anderson registers for NextGen by 12/15/2022. Signed by Clerk on 12/1/2022. (eAttyAnderson) (kms) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Alan M. Anderson ( Pro Hac Vice Fee $ 100 receipt number AIANDC-3806875) by Plaintiff Reliance Systems, Inc (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (Sealey, Patrick) |
| Filing 12 DEFENDANTS Brief re #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by O'Brien County, Iowa (Phillips, Douglas) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant O'Brien County, Iowa Responses due by 12/1/2022 (Phillips, Douglas) |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by O'Brien County, Iowa. (Phillips, Douglas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Clausen on behalf of O'Brien County, Iowa. (Phillips, Douglas) Modified on 11/4/2022 to correct attorney apearing (kms). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas L Phillips on behalf of O'Brien County, Iowa. (Phillips, Douglas) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED Complaint With Jury Demand against O'Brien County, Iowa, filed by Reliance Telephone of Grand Forks, Inc, Reliance Systems, Inc. (Sealey, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Reliance Telephone of Grand Forks, Inc, Reliance Systems, Inc. O'Brien County, Iowa waiver sent on 10/25/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Sealey, Patrick) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Reliance Telephone of Grand Forks, Inc (Sealey, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Reliance Systems, Inc (Sealey, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to O'Brien County, Iowa. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 New Civil Case Packet) (kms) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Attorney Patrick L. Sealey: Not Admitted to Practice in the United States District Court For the Northern District of Iowa. Admissions payment due by 11/8/2022. (kms) |
| Set Deadlines: Plaintiffs' LR 7.1 Disclosure Statement due by 11/14/2022. (kms) |
| Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (kms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand against O'Brien County, Iowa ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIANDC-3783024.), filed by Reliance Telephone of Grand Forks, Inc, Reliance Systems, Inc. Scheduling Report due by 1/22/2023 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sealey, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
