Euchner v. Iowa, State of et al
| Michael William Euchner, Sr |
| Iowa, State of, Ida County, Wade Harriman, Ida County Sheriff's Office and Ida County Attorney's Office |
| 5:2022cv04056 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Pro Se Complaint by Michael William Euchner Sr. Plaintiff pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in form pauperis within 30 days or this case will be dismissed with no further order of the court. Plaintiff file an amended complaint within 30 days or this case will be denied for failure to state a claim with no further order from the court. #2 Pro Se Motion for Summary Judgment is denied without prejudice to refiling at a later stage of the case. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 12/5/2022. (copy/1983 Complaint/IFP Form mailed to Plaintiff) (des)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Michael William Euchner, Sr Responses due by 12/13/2022 (PSLC) (NEF mailed to Plaintiff) (JLH) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Wade Harriman, Ida County, Ida County Attorney's Office, Ida County Sheriff's Office, Iowa, State of, filed by Michael William Euchner, Sr. Dismissal Deadline 2/5/2023. (ksy)(NEF to Plf)(PSLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
