Ehler v. Wheaton Franciscan Medical Plan et al
| Kymm Ehler |
| Wheaton Franciscan Medical Plan, Covenant Medical Center, Inc. and Wheaton Franciscan Services, Inc. |
| 6:2008cv02021 |
| April 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Black Hawk |
| Linda R Reade |
| Jon S Scoles |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 58 Report and Recommendations. The court AFFIRMS the Plan Administrator's decision to deny Plaintiff benefits. Plaintiff shall pay defendants' ordinary cost. Defendants may refile a motion for attorney fees and other cost by 7/17/2009, at 5 p.m. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 7/10/2009. (bjb)
|
|
Filing
58
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending the District Court affirm the Plan Administrator's decision to deny benefits. Objections to R&R due by 7/7/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 6/23/2009. (pac)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 51 Motion to Strike. The Appendix (docket number 49-2) filed with Ehler's trial brief will not be considered by the Court as part of its review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 4/22/2009. (de)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 25 Motion to Compel; granting 30 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 3/18/2009. (pac)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
