Tate v. Black Hawk County
Plaintiff: James William Tate, Jr
Defendant: Black Hawk County
Case Number: 6:2010cv02006
Filed: February 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Eastern Waterloo Office
County: Black Hawk
Presiding Judge: Edward J McManus
Presiding Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER dismissing 3 Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James William Tate, Jr. Petitioner's counsel is granted leave to withdraw in accordance herewith. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue. Signed by Senior Judge Edward J McManus on 5/3/2012. (skm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tate v. Black Hawk County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James William Tate, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Black Hawk County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?