Seabrooke v. Upper Iowa University
Plaintiff: Lynne Seabrooke
Defendant: Upper Iowa University
Case Number: 6:2010cv02028
Filed: April 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Eastern Waterloo Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Presiding Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12100 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 and 20 Motions in Limine. (See text of Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 9/2/2011. (Stigler, Karo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seabrooke v. Upper Iowa University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynne Seabrooke
Represented By: Dale Lee Putnam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Upper Iowa University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?