Cains v. Griffith et al
| Ricky Cains |
| Kim Griffith and Any and All Unnamed Persons |
| 6:2011cv02051 |
| August 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Eastern Waterloo Office |
| Black Hawk |
| Linda R Reade |
| Jon S Scoles |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
INITIAL Review Order Dismissing Case: 1 Plaintiff's Application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Clerk of Court shall file the complaint without prepayment of the filing fee. Plaintiff is directed to submit an initial partial filing fe e in the Amount of $5.00 by no later than 9/8/11. The institution having custody of the Plaintiff is directed to collect and remit monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(b)(2). The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order and the notice of collection of filing to the appropriate official at the place where the plaintiff is an inmate. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C Sec. 1983 action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(e)(2)(B). The dismissal of the instant action counts against the plaintiff for the purposes of the three-dismissal rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 8/29/11. (Copy w/NEF to Plf; Copy to Black Hawk County Jail, CRF) (ksy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
