Cerny-Deahl v. Launderville et al
| Sandra Cerny-Deahl |
| Kevin Launderville and City of Hudson, Iowa |
| 6:2014cv02010 |
| February 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Eastern Waterloo Office |
| Black Hawk |
| Linda R Reade |
| Jon S Scoles |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion is granted with respect to Cerny-Deahl's violation of due process based on a property interest claim in Count I. The Motion is granted with respect to Cerny -Deahl's violation of due process based on a liberty interest claim in Count II. The Motion is denied with respect to Cerny-Deahl's defamation claim in Count III. The Motion is denied with respect to Cerny-Deahl's claim for punitive damages. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 7/21/2015. (skm)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Unresisted Motion for Extension of Deadline for Plaintiffs Rebuttal Expert Witness filed by Sandra Cerny-Deahl. Defendants Expert Witnesses due by 1/5/2015. Plaintiffs Rebuttal Experts due by 2/2/2015. The 2/13/2015 discovery deadline remains unchanged. The parties are reminded that 8/17/2015 remains a firm trial date. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 12/22/2014. (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
