Kuennen et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc - Dft Wright Medical Group, Inc termed per #7
| Martin P. Kuennen and Carol Kuennen |
| Wright Medical Technology, Inc |
| 6:2014cv02045 |
| July 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Eastern Waterloo Office |
| Fayette |
| Linda R Reade |
| Jon S Scoles |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 41 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for attorney George E. McLaughlin on behalf of the Plaintiffs Martin P. Kuennen and Carol Kuennen. ECF Registration due by 4/3/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 3/20/2015 (conflicts checked, none found) (copy w/NEF and ECF Registration form emailed to attorney McLaughlin). (skm)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Protective Order. (See text of Ruling.) Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 2/25/2015. (Stigler, Karo)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for attorney Tiffany L. Carpenter on behalf of Defendants Wright Medical Group, Inc., and Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 1/20/2015 (conflicts checked, none found). (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
