Kemp v. State of Iowa
Plaintiff: Jeffery Kemp
Defendant: State of Iowa
Case Number: 6:2015cv02102
Filed: November 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Eastern Waterloo Office
County: Black Hawk
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Presiding Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting 3 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jeffery Kemp. The Petitioner's 1 Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 12/28/2015 (copy w/NEF mailed to Plt). (skm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kemp v. State of Iowa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffery Kemp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Iowa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?