Roys v. Upper Iowa University
Plaintiff: Carolyn Roys
Defendant: Upper Iowa University
Case Number: 6:2016cv02046
Filed: May 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Eastern Waterloo Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Edward J McManus
Presiding Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: Denying 27 Motion to Strike: Denying as Moot 29 Motion in Limine: Granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment: Judgment should be entered in favor of Defendant Upper Iowa University. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly Mahoney on 08/17/17. (kfs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roys v. Upper Iowa University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Roys
Represented By: Erik W Fern
Represented By: Dale Lee Putnam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Upper Iowa University
Represented By: Emily S Pontius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?