Back v. Department of Human Services et al
Plaintiff: Jennifer Sue Back
Defendant: Department of Human Services and Christine Weber
Petitioner: Jennifer Back
Case Number: 6:2021cv02015
Filed: February 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Mark A Roberts
Referring Judge: Leonard T Strand
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Pro Se Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 4/5/2021. (Copy w/NEF to Plf) (jag)
March 30, 2021 Filing 5 MAIL Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jennifer Sue Back which included NEFs of #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #4 Motion to Dismiss. Mail re-sent to address found on IDOC website. Address updated. (pac)
March 15, 2021 Filing 4 PRO SE MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Jennifer Sue Back (NEF mailed to Pltf per PSLC) (jjh)
March 15, 2021 Filing 3 AMENDED PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jennifer Sue Back (#1 Amended 1983 Complaint) (NEF mailed to Pltf per PSLC) (jjh).
March 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jennifer Sue Back: If Back does not either file an amended motion within thirty days, or pay the $402 filing fee, this case will be dismissed with no further order of the court. The Clerk's office is directed to send her the standard in forma pauperis form. If Back does not file an amended complaint within 30 days, this case will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A with no further order of the court. The Clerk's office is directed to send Back the standard 42 U.S.C. 1983 form. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 3/3/2021 (copy w/NEF and IFP/1983 packet mailed to Plt). (skm)
February 22, 2021 Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Jennifer Back. (Attachments: #1 1983 Petition (not signed)) (ksy)(NEF to Pet)(PSLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Back v. Department of Human Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christine Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jennifer Back
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Sue Back
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?