Plasa v. Spray et al
| Michael Plasa |
| Adam Spray and United States Marshals Service |
| 6:2021cv02025 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| CJ Williams |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER re #1 Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Michael Plasa. Petitioner is now incarcerated at the Rochester Federal Medical Center, in Rochester, Minnesota. The proper respondent is the warden of that facility, and the proper jurisdiction is the District of Minnesota. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer the petition to the District of Minnesota, and administratively close this case. See 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). In this order, the Court expresses no opinion about the merits of the petition. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 4/5/2021. (copy w/nef mailed to petitioner; case electronically transferred to District of Minnesota) (des) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/6/2021: #1 Receipt Confirmation) (des).
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Plasa. Dismissal Deadline 7/12/2021. (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh) |
| FEE Receipt: $5.00, receipt number IAN110029102 for filing fee by Michael Plasa (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
