Regenold v. American Colloid Company
| Amanda Ashton Regenold |
| American Colloid Company doing business as Minerals Technologies, Inc |
| 6:2021cv02050 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PROPOSED Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan by Plaintiff Amanda Ashton Regenold (Greiner, Gregory) |
| Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney. Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney no longer assigned to the case as presider. (done pursuant to #10 & KEM chambers) (kms) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Meghan E Hill on behalf of Defendant American Colloid Company. Upon a review of the Motion and the Certificate of Good Standing, the court finds the Motion should be granted. Signed by Clerk on 11/04/2021. (des) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Meghan E. Hill ( Pro Hac Vice Fee $ 100 receipt number AIANDC-3560926) by Defendant American Colloid Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Hill, Meghan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory F Greiner on behalf of Amanda Ashton Regenold. (Greiner, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 STATE Court Petition with Jury Demand by Amanda Ashton Regenold. (pac) |
| Filing 5 DOCKET Annotation: Attached is the case packet used in removal cases. (pac) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge. Check Status Deadline due by 11/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent to a Magistrate Judge) (pac) |
| Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added (no conflicts identified). (pac) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by American Colloid Company identifying Corporate Parent Minerals Technologies, Inc for American Colloid Company. (Borland, Nathan) |
| Filing 2 Defendants ANSWER With Jury Demand to Complaint by American Colloid Company.(Borland, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, case number LACV143353. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIANDC-3546661), filed by American Colloid Company. Scheduling Report due by 12/7/2021 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1) (Borland, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Regenold v. American Colloid Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanda Ashton Regenold | |
| Represented By: | Gregory F Greiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Colloid Company doing business as Minerals Technologies, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Nathan James Borland |
| Represented By: | Meghan E Hill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
