Murphy v. Strode
| Benjamin Michael Murphy |
| Johnetta M Strode and Johnetta Daye |
| 6:2022cv02041 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| CJ Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Plaintiff has failed to state claims for which relief can be granted. The petition is dismissed. Signed by Clerk on 10/05/2022. (ksy)()copy to Plf) |
Filing 3
INITIAL Review Order Dismissing Case: Plaintiff's Application to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is granted. The Clerk of Court will consider the petition in 22-CV-2041 CJW-MAR filed without the prepayment of fees. After an initial review, plaintiff has failed to state claims for which relief can be granted. Accordingly, the petition in case 22-CV-2041 CJW-MAR is dismissed. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 10/5/2022. (ksy)(copy to Plf)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE SEALED Ex Parte Motion for Emergency Protection Order by Plaintiff Benjamin Michael Murphy. (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh) Modified text on 9/19/2022 (skm). |
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Benjamin Michael Murphy (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh) |
| Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. (conflicts checked, none found) (jjh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
