Ford v. Marsh et al
| Miguel Ford |
| Joshua Lee Marsh, Nicholas Berry, Matt Isley and Aaron Podaski |
| 6:2023cv02010 |
| January 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
| CJ Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PRO SE SUPPLEMENT to #3 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Miguel Ford (PSLC) (nef mailed to plaintiff) (des) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Miguel Ford (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (PSLC) (NEF mailed to Plaintiff) (jlh) |
Filing 2
ORDER: Plaintiff is given thirty days from the date of this order to either pay the complete $402 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is given thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint using the standard Section 1983 form. Amended Pleadings due by 2/24/2023. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 1/25/2023. (Mailed to plaintiff with IFP and 1983 forms) (pac) Modified text on 1/26/2023 (pac).
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Nicholas Berry, Matt Isley, Joshua Lee Marsh, Aaron Podaski, filed by Miguel Ford. Dismissal Deadline 5/8/2023. (ksy)(NEF to Plf)(PSLC) Modified filed date on 1/25/2023 (ksy). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
