Hoosman v. Thompson et al
Plaintiff: Cornell A Hoosman
Defendant: Tony Thompson, Nathan Neff and Lionel Braun
Case Number: 6:2023cv02013
Filed: January 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Mark A Roberts
Referring Judge: Leonard T Strand
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2023 Filing 8 JUDGMENT in favor of Lionel Braun, Nathan Neff, Tony Thompson against Cornell A Hoosman. Signed by Clerk on 2/27/2023. (Mailed to plaintiff) (pac)
February 23, 2023 Filing 7 PRO SE Correspondence by Cornell A Hoosman (PSLC) (NEF mailed to Plaintiff) (jlh)
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL Review Order: #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Clerk of Court is directed to file the complaint without the prepayment of fees. Prisoner Cornell A Hoosman to submit an initial filing fee in the Amount of $19.77. Complaint dismissed because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. #2 Motion to appoint counsel denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 2/23/2023. (Mailed to plaintiff with appeal packet; Mailed to Black Hawk County Jail) (pac)
February 21, 2023 Filing 5 PRO SE Correspondence by Cornell A Hoosman (LTS) (NEF mailed to Plaintiff) (jlh)
February 16, 2023 Filing 4 PRO SE SUPPLEMENT to #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cornell A Hoosman (ksy)(NEF to Plf)(PSLC)
February 9, 2023 Filing 3 PRO SE SUPPLEMENT to #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cornell A Hoosman. (PSLC) (NEF to Plaintiff) (rjs) Modified text on 2/10/2023 (rjs).
February 9, 2023 Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Cornell A Hoosman. (PSLC) (NEF to plaintiff) (rjs) Modified on 2/10/2023 (rjs).
January 30, 2023 Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Cornell A Hoosman (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (PSLC) (nef mailed to plaintiff) (des)
January 30, 2023 Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (des)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoosman v. Thompson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cornell A Hoosman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tony Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathan Neff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lionel Braun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?