Artisani v. Naph Care et al
Nersius Adonliel Artisani and Roger Joseph Hoffert, Jr |
Naph Care, Dr Nicholas Goetsch, Dr John Rizzi, Dr Kathy Unknown, Jessica Frater, Julie Foster, Jaquie Unknown and Dr Bartelt |
6:2023cv02089 |
December 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Mark A Roberts |
CJ Williams |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
FEE Receipt: $ 405, receipt number 471 for Civil Filing Fee by Nersius Adonliel Artisani (klh) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #10 Pro Se Motion for Extension of Time to pay the filing fee by Plaintiff Nersius Adonliel Artisani: The Court will grant plaintiff an additional 45 days from the date of this order to pay the full filing fee. In addition, the Court directs the Black Hawk County Attorney 30 days to provide a response limited to plaintiff's allegations regarding his prior payment of the filing fee via CHIME. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 1/23/2024. (Copy to Plaintiff/Copy of Order/Complaint/Motion to Black Hawk County Attorney) (des) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER denying #11 Motion to Set Aside Order #11 MOTION to Set Aside/Reconsider Order #8 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel,, Order on Motion for Recusal,, Order on Motion to Amend or Correct. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 1/20/24. (CJW) NEF mailed to Plaintiff on 1/22/2024 (pac). |
Filing 11 PRO SE MOTION to Reconsider #8 Order by Plaintiff Nersius Adonliel Artisani (PSLC) (NEF to Paintiff) (des) |
Filing 13 PRO SE MOTION to Amend #9 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Nersius Adonliel Artisani. (PSLC)(NEF to Plaintiff) (ksy) |
Filing 10 PRO SE MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee by Plaintiff Nersius Adonliel Artisani. (PSLC)(NEF to Plaintiff) (ksy) |
Filing 9 AMENDED Pro Se Complaint with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Nersius Adonliel Artisani. (NEF to Plaintiff) (mmc) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Recusal; denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting #7 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk's Office is directed to detach and file the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 12/29/2023. (Copy to Plaintiff) (mmc) |
Filing 7 PRO SE MOTION to Amend Complaint by Plaintiff Nersius Adonliel Artisani (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Cover Letter) (PSLC) (NEF to Plaintiff) (des) |
Filing 6 PRO SE Correspondence by Nersius Adonliel Artisani. (PSLC) (NEF to Plaintiff) (rjs) |
PARTIAL Filing Fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 3110 (rjs) |
Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION for Recusal by Plaintiff Nersius Adonliel Artisani (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (PSLC) (NEF to Plaintiff) (jlh) |
Filing 4 SEALED PRO SE SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by PlaintiffNersius Adonliel Artisani. (PSLC)(NEF to Plaintiff) (kms) |
Filing 3 ORDER: Plaintiff to pay full $405 filing fee and file an amended complaint by 1/10/2024. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 12/11/2023. (Copy/1983 Form to Plaintiff (des) |
Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Nersius Adonliel Artisani (PSLC) (NEF to Palinitff) (jlh) |
Filing 1 SEALED PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Nersius Adonliel Artisani. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (PSLC) (NEF to Plaintiff.) (jlh) Modified security on 12/8/2023 (jlh) |
Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.