Warriax v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Roger Warriax
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Ssaogcomms
Case Number: 6:2023cv02094
Filed: December 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Judge Kelly KE Mahoney
Referring Judge: CJ Williams
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1381 Supplemental Security Income Benefits (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2023 Filing 5 DOCKET Annotation: Please see New Case Packet attached (jlh)
December 15, 2023 Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Roger Warriax. (jlh)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: The Clerk of Court is ordered to file the complaint and docket the notice of social security case service. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney on 12/15/2023. (jlh)
December 15, 2023 Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules of Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/15/2023, answer due 2/13/2024. (jlh)
December 15, 2023 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Bryan Konoski: Upon review of the Motion and the Certificate of Good Standing, the court finds the Motion should be granted. Signed by Clerk on 12/15/2023. (kms)
December 15, 2023 Judge CJ Williams and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. Motions referred to Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney. (No conflicts identified) (kms)
December 14, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Bryan Konoski ( Pro Hac Vice Fee $ 100 receipt number AIANDC-4058478) by Plaintiff Roger Warriax (Attachments: #1 cert of good standing) (Carter, Ruth)
December 14, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Roger Warriax. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 complaint) (Carter, Ruth) Modified text and changed to motion on 12/15/2023 (kms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warriax v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Ssaogcomms
Represented By: Ssaogcomms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Warriax
Represented By: Bryan Konoski
Represented By: Ruth M Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?