Peterson v. Unknown
| Matthew Peterson |
| Unknown, Naph Care and Nurse Stevie |
| 6:2024cv02001 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
| CJ Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Amended 1983)(PSLC)(NEF to Plaintiff) (ksy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Dismissal Pursuant to Local Rule 41(a)(4): Unless appropriate action is taken by 2/22/2024, this action will be dismissed. Signed by Clerk on 2/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 41) (Mailed to Plaintiff with Order at #2 and 1983 and IFP form) (pac) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Correspondence by Matthew Peterson (PSLC) (NEF and copy of 1983 complaint to Plaintiff) (rjs) |
Filing 2
ORDER: Plaintiff file amended complaint and either pay filing fee or file amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 1/04/2024. (copy/forms mailed to plaintiff) (des)
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Peterson. (Attachments: #1 1983 Complaint)(PSLC)(NEF to Plaintiff) (kms) |
| Judge CJ Williams and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. No conflicts identified. (kms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
