Cornelsen v. MV Transportation, Inc.
Bradley R. Cornelsen |
MV Transportation, Inc. and MV Contract Transportation Inc. |
1:2018cv00037 |
October 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Helen C Adams |
Celeste F Bremer |
James E Gritzner |
Stephanie M Rose |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Amended Complaint) by MV Transportation, Inc.. Responses due by 12/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Jones, Kathryn) |
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Kelly R. Vickers. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 11/30/2018. (kjw) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by MV Transportation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Vickers, Kelly) |
Filing 12 PRO SE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against MV Contract Transportation, Inc, MV Transportation, Inc., filed by Bradley R. Cornelsen. (vr) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure/Statement of Interest by MV Transportation, Inc.. (Jones, Kathryn) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER denying #9 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 11/20/2018. (k) (hard copy mailed to plaintiff at YANKTON-FPCP.O. Box 700Yankton, SD 57078) |
Filing 9 PRO SE MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel by Bradley R. Cornelsen.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. Responses due by 12/3/2018. (vr) |
Filing 8 REPLY Brief re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by MV Transportation, Inc..(Jones, Kathryn) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 11/9/2018. (k) (hard copy mailed to Plaintiff at P.O. Box 700 Yankton, SD 57078) |
Filing 6 PRO SE RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Bradley R. Cornelsen. Replies due by 11/15/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1) (vr) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by MV Transportation, Inc.. Responses due by 11/16/2018. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Jones, Kathryn) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and Resistance to Motion for Extension of time to Answer by Bradley R. Cornelsen. Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. Responses due by 11/14/2018. (slg) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/1/2018) corrected envelope (don). |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants shall have to and including Monday 11/5/2018 to move or plead to the complaint. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/24/2018. (k) |
Judge Stephanie M. Rose and Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams added. Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer and Senior Judge James E. Gritzner no longer assigned to case. Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. (don) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Corporate Disclosure Statement deadline set for defendant 11/21/2018. (kmc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by MV Transportation, Inc..Motions referred to Celeste F. Bremer. (Jones, Kathryn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MV Transportation, Inc. Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0863-3628520., filed by MV Transportation, Inc.. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 1/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Jones, Kathryn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.