Heywood v. Menard, Inc.
| Davis Heywood, Davis Nicalous Heywood and Cindy L. Heywood |
| Menard, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00021 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Stephanie M Rose |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Remand Letter and Federal filed case being sent back to Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County per remand order. (vr) (Main Document 15 replaced on 1/24/2023) (vr). |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (vr) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #10 Defendant's Motion to Remand. See Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge Stephanie M. Rose on 1/19/2023. (mne)
|
| Filing 13 Joinder re #10 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Menard, Inc.. (Pattermann, T.) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ORDER ACCELERATING DEADLINE. On or before 1/20/2023, Plaintiff shall file a response to #10 Defendant's Motion to Remand, including a statement whether Plaintiff joins the Motion. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 1/18/2023. (amp) |
| Filing 11 TEXT MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 1/18/2023. No appearance was made on behalf of Plaintiff. Attorney Schott appeared on behalf of Defendant. Status of the case discussed. Order to follow. Total Court Time: 10 minutes. (amp) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Menard, Inc.. Responses due by 1/31/2023. (Schott, Mary) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER AND DISCOVERY PLAN . (Schott, Mary) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure/Statement of Interest by Menard, Inc.. (Schott, Mary) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ORDER re: #6 Plaintiffs' Resistance to Defendant's Notice of Removal. To the extent this filing is intended to be a motion, Counsel for Plaintiffs shall comply with LR 7 in redrafting and refiling it, including but not limited to citing the statutes or rules under which the motion is being made. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 1/4/2023. (amp) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Davis Nicalous Heywood re #1 Notice of Removal, Resistance. (Pattermann, T.) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 1/18/2023 10:00 AM before Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams. Counsel shall call 1-877-336-1829 and enter code 1176783.The parties shall file a proposed scheduling order and discovery plan as provided under L.R. 16 by 1/11/2023. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 12/27/2022. (amp) |
| Filing 4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Menard, Inc..(Burns, John) |
| Filing 3 *Filing error - correct filing to be submitted and signed by John M. Burns* Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Menard, Inc..(Burns, John) Modified on 12/21/2022 (vr). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Packet Note: Counsel should download the attached corporate disclosure packet in compliance with Local Rule 7.1 for the disclosure statements. Corporate Disclosure Statement deadline set for defendant 1/4/2023. (kjw) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Menard, Inc. from Iowa District Court, case number LACV123475. Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number AIASDC-5005782., filed by Menard, Inc.. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 3/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Petition)(Burns, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
