Whaley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Mark Whaley |
Commissioner Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2024cv00001 |
January 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
Stephen B Jackson |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Bryan Konoski. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen B. Jackson, Jr on 2/5/2024. (btg) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: AIASDC-5364168 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Mark Whaley. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Carter, Ruth) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendation. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 1/22/2024. (h) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 1/22/2024. (h) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Mark Whaley. (Attachments: #1 civil cover)(Carter, Ruth) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark Whaley. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carter, Ruth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.