Sarvestaney v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Cyrus Sarvestaney
Defendant: Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2019cv00033
Filed: March 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Stephen B Jackson
Referring Judge: Charles R Wolle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION by Cyrus Sarvestaney to preserve audio recordings.Motion referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 7/25/2019. (rmj)
July 11, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION To Place Audio Recordings under court custody by Cyrus Sarvestaney.Motion referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 7/25/2019. (rmj)
June 27, 2019 Filing 9 ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Wolle on 6/27/2019. (alb)
June 13, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Cyrus Sarvestaney. Motion referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 6/27/2019. (dmh)
June 10, 2019 Filing 7 TEXT ORDER. Plaintiff shall file a brief on all issues or before 8/8/19. Defendant shall file a brief on all issues on or before 10/9/19. Plaintiff may file a reply brief by 10/16/19. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Wolle on 6/10/2019. (alb)
June 10, 2019 Set Deadlines: Plaintiff's Brief is due 8/8/2019. Defendant Responsive Brief is due 10/9/2019. Plaintiff's Reply Brief is due by 10/16/2019. (dmh)
June 7, 2019 Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT (SOCIAL SECURITY). (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10)(Faith, David)
June 7, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Faith, David)
April 26, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cyrus Sarvestaney. Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/11/2019, answer due 6/10/2019. (bp)
April 1, 2019 Filing 3 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Wolle on 4/1/2019. (alb)
March 29, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cyrus Sarvestaney. (rmj)
March 29, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration filed by Cyrus Sarvestaney. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 6/27/2019. (rmj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sarvestaney v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: David L.D. Faith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cyrus Sarvestaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?