Raders v. Price et al
James L. Raders |
RSM U.S., L.L.P. and Dean R. Price |
3:2019cv00063 |
September 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Celeste F Bremer |
John A Jarvey |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Civil Case Terminated per Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice #5 . (bp) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James L. Raders (Dutton, David) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James L. Raders. RSM U.S., L.L.P. served on 9/6/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. (Dutton, David) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of re: Service by James L. Raders. (Dutton, David) |
Filing 2 Summons/Corporate Disclosure Packet. Note: Counsel should download the attached summons and/or corporate disclosure packet, if applicable. In compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons and Local Rule 7.1 for the disclosure statements. (Attachments: #1 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Packet) (dmh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Dean R Price, RSM U.S., L.L.P. Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0863-3911677., filed by James Raders. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 12/2/2019. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 12/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Priebe, Erich) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.