Fender v. Lutheran Living of Muscatine
| Quantaz Fender and Quantaz Jamar Fender |
| Lutheran Living of Muscatine |
| 3:2019cv00076 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
| Stephen B Jackson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons/Corporate Disclosure Packet. The attached Summons and corporate disclosure packet were mailed to Plaintiff in compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons and Local Rule 7.1 for the disclosure statements. (Attachments: #1 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Packet) (dmh) |
Filing 3
ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 12/10/2019. Copy of Order mailed by chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (hfh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Quantaz Fender. (bp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lutheran Living of Muscatine, filed by Quantaz Fender. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 1/15/2020. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 1/15/2020. (bp) |
| Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger and Magistrate Judge Stephen B. Jackson, Jr added. Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams and Senior Judge James E. Gritzner no longer assigned to case. (bp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
