Ismail v. United States Department of State et al
| Laila Ismail |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, United States Department of State and US Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 3:2019cv00084 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Celeste F Bremer |
| Charles R Wolle |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Laila Ismail Proof of Service on S. Dist. US Attorney Office on 11/21/19 (Erickson, Daniela) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laila Ismail. All Defendants. (Erickson, Daniela) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint by Laila Ismail. (Talmadge, Daniela) |
| Filing 2 Summons Packet. Note: Counsel should download the attached summons in compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons. (dmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0863-3966160., filed by Laila Ismail. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 1/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Franklin, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
