Casey v Does

Plaintiff: Edward Casey
Defendant: John/Jan Does (1-20) and John/Jane Does (1-20)
Case Number: 3:2020cv00083
Filed: October 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Helen C Adams
Referring Judge: Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE by Edward Casey Proof of Publication (Friedman, Shari)
November 3, 2020 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Edward Casey. (Friedman, Shari) Modified on 11/4/2020 corrected text (kjw).
October 27, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND MONITION: re #6 MONITION, #5 ORDER,. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 10/27/2020. (don)
October 27, 2020 Filing 6 MONITION re #5 Order,. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 10/27/2020. (don)
October 27, 2020 Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF NOTICE OF COMPLAINT; APPROVING AD INTERIM STIPULATION FOR VALUE; APPROVING STIPULATION OF COSTS; AND ORDERER IN MONITION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF RESTRAINING PROSECUTION OF CLAIM. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 10/27/2020. (don)
October 6, 2020 Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Shari Friedman. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/6/2020. (slg)
October 6, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: 0863-4266041 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Edward Casey. (Friedman, Shari)
October 6, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION Entry of Orders Directing Issuance of Notice of Complaint; Approving Ad Interim Stipulation for Value; Approving Stipulation of Costs; and Ordering Monition and Injunctive Relief Restraining Prosecution of Claims by Edward Casey.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. Responses due by 10/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Ad Interim Stipulation for Value, #4 Stipulation of Costs)(Shaff, Martha)
October 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0863-4265759., filed by Edward Casey. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 1/4/2021. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 1/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shaff, Martha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Casey v Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John/Jan Does (1-20)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John/Jane Does (1-20)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Casey
Represented By: Martha L. Shaff
Represented By: Shari L. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?