Givan v. Henley et al
Yul Givan |
Cathy Gibb, Henley, Melissa, Boltz, Moret, Burlington Police Department, C/O Allen and Allen |
3:2020cv00087 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Helen C Adams |
Robert W Pratt |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 vp |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Yul Givan which included #1 Complaint. (kjw) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT in favor of Allen, Boltz, Burlington Police Department, Henley, Melissa, Moret, Cathy Gibb against Yul Givan. Signed by Clerk John S. Courter on 11/4/2020. (kjw) |
Filing 5 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #4 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Complaint is Dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge Robert W. Pratt on 11/3/2020. (kjw) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Yul Givan. Responses due by 11/16/2020. (bp) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Yul Givan. ***The envelope return address is showing a Victor Perkins #08703-039 @ Federal Medical Center, PMB 4000, Rochester, MN 55903-4000 (don) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Yul Givan. (kjw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Yul Givan. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 1/17/2021. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 1/17/2021. (kjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.