Richardson et al v. Sigma Lambda Gamma National Sorority, Inc.
Mikekena Richardson, Lannette Richardson, Lannette M. Richardson and Mikekena B. Richardson |
Sigma Lambda Gamma National Sorority, Inc. |
3:2020cv00097 |
December 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Helen C Adams |
Stephanie M Rose |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons/Corporate Disclosure Packet Note: Counsel should download the attached summons and/or corporate disclosure packet, if applicable. In compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons and Local Rule 7.1 for the disclosure statements. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 7.1 Packet) (kmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Sigma Lambda Gamma National Sorority, Inc. Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number IAS400023194, filed by Mikekena Richardson, Lannette Richardson. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 3/2/2021. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 3/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit ICRC Notice of Right to Sue - Lannette, #3 Exhibit ICRC Notice of Right to Sue - Mikekena)(Mail, Eric) Modified on 12/4/2020 added new receipt with correct filing fee (slg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.