Nasuti v. Holm
| Matt Nasuti |
| Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Medical Associates Clinic, PC and Does 1-30 |
| 3:2022cv00025 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
| Stephen B Jackson |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson-Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough and the Department of Veterans Affairs by Matt Nasuti. Responses due by 7/8/2022. (bp) Modified on 6/24/2022 (bp - Correct parties in pleading). |
| Filing 23 REPLY re #21 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Matt Nasuti. (bp) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE to Motion re #21 MOTION for Sanctions DEFENDANTS' RESISTANCE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS filed by Does, Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough, United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Replies due by 6/29/2022.(Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 21 MOTION for (Rule 11) Sanctions by Matt Nasuti.Motion referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 6/22/2022. (bp) |
| Filing 20 REPLY re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Matt Nasuti. (bp) |
| Filing 19 Errata re #18 Response to Motion, filed by Judith Johnson Mekota, Adrian Holm, Does, Denis Richard McDonough, United States Department of Veterans Affairs. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #13 MOTION for Limited Early Discovery filed by Does, Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough, United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Replies due by 6/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Purdy, William) |
| Filing 17 ***SUPPLEMENTAL*** RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION filed by Does, Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough, United States Department of Veterans Affairs. R(Lawrence, Jason) Modified on 6/3/2022 removed reply deadline (kjw). |
| Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT/ADDENDUM to #13 MOTION for Limited Early Discovery by Matt Nasuti. (bp) |
Filing 15
TEXT ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE: In response to Plaintiff's Application for Emergency Nationwide Preliminary Injunction #4 , Defendants did not directly address Plaintiff's requests for an evidentiary hearing and witness subpoenas. As such, Defendants shall supplement their response by addressing whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary and Plaintiff's request regarding witnesses. Defendants must file their supplementation by June 1, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. on 5/24/2022. (jeb)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY re #8 MOTION for In Camera Review filed by Matt Nasuti. (bp) |
| Filing 13 TEXT MOTION for Limited Early Discovery by Matt Nasuti.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 6/3/2022. See pleading #12 for image. (bp) |
| Filing 12 REPLY re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Matt Nasuti. (bp) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION for In Camera Review filed by Adrian Holm. Replies due by 5/23/2022.(Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Does, Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough, United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Replies due by 5/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Resistance to Motion for Injunction, #2 Exhibit A to Brief in Support of Resistance to Motion for Injunction)(Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 9 REPLY Brief in Support of re #6 MOTION to Substitute Party US MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION filed by Adrian Holm. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for In Camera Review by Matt Nasuti.Motion referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 5/27/2022. (bp) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Substitute Party US MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION filed by Matt Nasuti. Replies due by 5/16/2022. (rm) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Substitute Party US MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION by Adrian Holm.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 5/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 MEMORANDUM OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF US MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION, #2 EXHIBIT A)(Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough, Medical Associates Clinic, PC, United States Department of Veterans Affairs. (bp) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Emergency Nationwide Preliminary Injunction; Request for Witness Subpoenas; In the Alternative Request for a U.S. Marshal Protective Detail by Matt Nasuti.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 5/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matt Nasuti, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope) (bp) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Does 1-30, Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough, Medical Associates Clinic, PC, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, filed by Matt Nasuti. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bp) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Adrian Holm re #1 Notice of Removal by USA LOCAL RULE 81.1 LIST (Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL BY USA by Adrian Holm from Johnson County, case number SCSC101556., filed by Adrian Holm. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lawrence, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
