Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Dayle Wayne Campbell
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2023cv00010
Filed: February 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger
Referring Judge: Stephen B Jackson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2023 Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT (SOCIAL SECURITY). (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12, #12 Part 13, #13 Part 14, #14 Part 15, #15 Part 16, #16 Part 17, #17 Part 18, #18 Part 19, #19 Part 20, #20 Part 21, #21 Part 22, #22 Part 23, #23 Part 24, #24 Part 25, #25 Part 26, #26 Part 27, #27 Part 28, #28 Part 29, #29 Part 30, #30 Part 31, #31 Part 32, #32 Part 33, #33 Part 34, #34 Part 35, #35 Part 36, #36 Part 37, #37 Part 38, #38 Part 39, #39 Part 40, #40 Part 41, #41 Part 42, #42 Part 43, #43 Part 44, #44 Part 45)(Scherle, Rachel)
April 21, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel J. Scherle on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Scherle, Rachel)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Karl E. Osterhout. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen B. Jackson, Jr on 2/28/2023. (kjw)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendation. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 2/28/2023. (h)
February 27, 2023 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 2744H0K4 for Filing Fee by Dayle Wayne Campbell (btg)
February 24, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: AIASDC-5071247 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Dayle Wayne Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Osterhout, Karl)
February 24, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Dayle Wayne Campbell. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 5/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cornell, Danny)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dayle Wayne Campbell
Represented By: Danny L. Cornell
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Represented By: Rachel J. Scherle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?