Thomas v. Villavicencio, et al
| Andrew G. Thomas |
| Novelis Aluminum, TM and Jhadira Villavicencio |
| 3:2023cv00044 |
| July 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Stephanie M Rose |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER denying #5 Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Chief Judge Stephanie M. Rose on 7/31/2023. (mne)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Reopen Case by Andrew G. Thomas. Responses due by 7/31/2023. (bp) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Novelis Aluminum, TM, Jhadira Villavicencio against Andrew G. Thomas. Signed by Clerk John S. Courter on 7/12/2023. (btg) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER finding as moot #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Case dismissed. See Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge Stephanie M. Rose on 7/11/2023. (mne) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/11/2023) (mne).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew G. Thomas. (bp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Novelis Aluminum, TM, Jhadira Villavicencio, filed by Andrew G. Thomas. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 10/3/2023. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 10/3/2023. (bp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
