Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Kendal Manning |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2023cv00055 |
| August 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Rules 6, 7, and 8 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security, Plaintiff's brief is due on or before 11/13/2023. Defendant's brief is due on or before 12/13/2023. Plaintiff's reply brief is due on or before 12/27/2023. The Court will deem this matter ready for submission on 12/27/2023, or upon timely filing of the reply brief, whichever occurs first. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/13/2023. (k) |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT (SOCIAL SECURITY). (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12, #12 Part 13, #13 Part 14)(Scherle, Rachel) |
| Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams added. Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams as referral judge and Judge Stephen H. Locher no longer assigned to case. (kjw) |
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE. See Order for particulars. Signed by Judge Stephen H. Locher on 9/5/2023. (mm)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Proceed Before US Magistrate by Commissioner of Social Security. (Scherle, Rachel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel J. Scherle on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Scherle, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Bryan Konoski. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 8/30/2023. (btg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: AIASDC-5234103 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Kendal Manning. (Murphy, Thad) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Stephen H. Locher on 8/29/2023. (mm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kendal Manning. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Murphy, Thad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Kendal Manning. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Murphy, Thad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kendal Manning | |
| Represented By: | Thad J. Murphy |
| Represented By: | Bryan Konoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Rachel J. Scherle |
| Represented By: | SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
