Baetsle v. Monsanto Company
| Darren Baetsle |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2023cv00078 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Stephen H Locher |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1407 md MDL: Multidistrict Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S CERTIFIED TRANSFER ORDER Northern District of California. (sml) |
| Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-431) - 1 action(s) re: pldg. (1 in IAS/3:23-cv-00078, 3289 in MDL No. 2741) Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Tiffaney D. Pete on 11/28/2023. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2741, IAS/3:23-cv-00078 (DLD) (sml) |
| Filing 5 TEXT MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-431) Finalized on 11/28/23. Please see pleading (3 in IAS/3:23-cv-00078, 3293 in MDL No. 2741).As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer.The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the N.D. California for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Tiffaney D. Pete on 11/28/2023. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2741, IAS/3:23-cv-00078 (DLD) (sml) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. Case electronically transferred to the Northern District of California. (sml) |
| Filing 4 Letter to MDL Panel regarding Potential Tag-Along Action. (sml) |
| Filing 3 Summons/Corporate Disclosure Packet Note: Counsel should download the attached summons and/or corporate disclosure packet, if applicable. In compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons and Local Rule 7.1 for the disclosure statements. (Attachments: #1 7.1 Packet) (nla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Darren Baetsle Notice of Potential Tag-Along Action. (Cook, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Darren Baetsle against Monsanto Company Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number AIASDC-5294395., filed by Darren Baetsle. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 2/12/2024. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 2/12/2024.(Cook, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baetsle v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darren Baetsle | |
| Represented By: | James H. Cook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
