Maharishi Ayur-Ved Products International Corporation v. Advocare International, LP
| Maharishi Ayur-Ved Products International Corporation |
| Advocare International, LP |
| 4:2018cv00165 |
| May 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Central Office |
| Jefferson |
| Stephanie M. Rose |
| Ross A Walters(R) |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maharishi Ayur-Ved Products International Corporation v. Advocare International, LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maharishi Ayur-Ved Products International Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Dana L. Oxley |
| Represented By: | Jason R. Sytsma |
| Represented By: | Mark L Zaiger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Advocare International, LP | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
