Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Amy L Anderson |
| Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security |
| 4:2018cv00257 |
| August 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Central Office |
| Polk |
| Celeste F Bremer |
| John A Jarvey |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge John A. Jarvey on 8/31/2018. (mem)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amy L Anderson. (Dowd, Brian) |
|
Filing 2
TEXT ORDER: When this case was filed on August 7, 2018, no filing fee was paid. No application to proceed In Forma Pauperis has been filed.By August 31, 2018, Plaintiff shall pay the required filing fee to the Clerk of Court, or shall apply for leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Failure to do so shall result in this case being dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer on 8/20/2018. (mlr)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Claimant Appellant against Social Security Administration, filed by Amy L Anderson. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 11/2/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet for Ptf)(Dowd, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
