Hebron v. Unity Point Healthcare, et al.
Cindy Christine Hebron |
Unity Point Healthcare, James Swegle and Patrice Herrara |
4:2018cv00279 |
August 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Central Office |
Polk |
Helen C Adams |
Robert W Pratt |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER denying #4 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Robert W. Pratt on 9/24/2018. (klw) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Reconsideration to Reopen Under Federal Question and Grant Forma Pauperis re #3 Order by Cindy Christine Hebron.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. Responses due by 9/18/2018. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (kjw) |
***Civil Case Terminated per Order #3 . (sjc) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint is dismissed. See order for particulars. Signed by Senior Judge Robert W. Pratt on 8/21/2018. (krn) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cindy Christine Hebron. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (krn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Patrice Herrara, James Swegle, Unity Point Healthcare, filed by Cindy Christine Hebron. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 11/19/2018. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 11/19/2018. (krn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.