Sloss v. Tyson Fresh Meats
Michael Sloss |
Tyson Fresh Meats |
4:2018cv00286 |
August 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Helen C Adams |
Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
Stephanie M Rose |
Labor: Other |
29 U.S.C. § 621 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MOTION to file overlength brief by Michael Sloss.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. Responses due by 11/9/2018. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Carroll, Michael) |
Filing 24 TEXT ORDER: ORDER granting #23 plaintiff's unresisted motion to extend reply deadline to defendant's resistance to motion to remand. Plaintiff may have to and including 10/26/2018 to file a reply. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/17/2018.(kln) |
Filing 23 Unresisted MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply to Resistance to Motion to Remand by Michael Sloss.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. Responses due by 10/30/2018. (Carroll, Michael) |
Filing 22 RESPONSE to Motion re #21 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Tyson Fresh Meats. Replies due by 10/16/2018. (Attachments: #1 Tab 1, #2 Tab 2, #3 Tab 3, #4 Tab 4, #5 Tab 5, #6 Tab 6, #7 Tab 7, #8 Tab 8, #9 Tab 9, #10 Tab 10, #11 Tab 11)(Cartmill, Espnola) |
Filing 21 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Michael Sloss. Responses due by 10/10/2018. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Appendix)(Carroll, Michael) |
Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure/Statement of Interest by Tyson Fresh Meats. (Cartmill, Espnola) |
Filing 19 Sealed Document re #12 MOTION to Strike #7 Sealed Document,, 18 Order on Motion to file overlength brief by Tyson Fresh Meats. (Bertrand, Erika) |
Filing 18 TEXT ORDER: ORDER granting #17 defendant's motion for leave to file an overlength reply brief. Defendant may file an overlength reply brief not to exceed 8 pages. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 9/5/2018.(kln) |
Filing 17 MOTION to file overlength brief (Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Strike) by Tyson Fresh Meats.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. Responses due by 9/19/2018. (Bertrand, Erika) |
Filing 16 Sealed Document re #12 MOTION to Strike #7 Sealed Document,, #13 Sealed Document by Tyson Fresh Meats. (Cartmill, Espnola) |
Filing 15 NOTICE by Tyson Fresh Meats re #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,, Tabs 38 and 39 of Appendix in Support of Notice of Removal (Cartmill, Espnola) |
Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger added. Judge Stephanie M. Rose no longer assigned to case. (don) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Corporate Disclosure Statement deadline set for defendant 9/12/2018. emailed packet to defense counsel. (don) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Strike #7 Sealed Document, filed by Michael Sloss. Replies due by 9/5/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (don) |
Filing 13 Sealed Document re #12 MOTION to Strike #7 Sealed Document, by Tyson Fresh Meats. (don) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Strike certain witnesses and exhibits from the plaintiff's resistance #7 Sealed Document filed by, by Tyson Fresh Meats.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. (don) |
Filing 11 Sealed Document main document is the plaintiff's appendix in support of resistance re #9 MOTION for Sanctions by Tyson Fresh Meats, Michael Sloss. (Attachments: #1 dft reply in support to motion for sanctions)(don) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Michael Sloss. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support) (don) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Sanctions by Tyson Fresh Meats.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support) (don) |
Filing 8 Sealed Document Exhibits to Appendix re #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Tyson Fresh Meats. (don) |
Filing 7 Sealed Document Main document is the dft memorandum in support of summary judgment re #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Tyson Fresh Meats, Michael Sloss. (Attachments: #1 dft appendix to motion s/j, #2 Statement of Undisputed Facts, #3 dft supplemental appendix motion s/j, #4 dft reply, #5 pltf appendix in support of resistance)(don) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Sloss. (Attachments: #1 Response to dft statement of facts both undisputed and disputed) (don) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Tyson Fresh Meats. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Appendix in Support) (don) |
Filing 4 Errata re #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,, filed by Tyson Fresh Meats. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Reck, Michael) |
Filing 3 PROTECTIVE ORDER filed in State Court (Dallas) and signed by a State Court Judge. (don) |
Filing 2 Sealed Document re #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,, Sealed Appendix in Support of Removal by Tyson Fresh Meats. (Attachments: #1 Tab 34 to Sealed Appendix, #2 Tab 35 to Sealed Appendix, #3 Tab 36 to Sealed Appendix, #4 Tab 37 to Sealed Appendix, #5 Tab 47 to Sealed Appendix, #6 Tab 48 to Sealed Appendix, #7 Tab 49 to Sealed Appendix, #8 Tab 51 to Sealed Appendix, #9 Tab 52 to Sealed Appendix, #10 Tab 54 to Sealed Appendix)(Reck, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Tyson Fresh Meats from District Court for Dallas County, case number LACV040283. Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0863-3579798., filed by Tyson Fresh Meats. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 11/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Rule 81.1 Certificate, #2 Affidavit In Support of Removal, #3 Appendix in Support of Removal, #4 Tab 1 to Appendix, #5 Tab 2 to Appendix, #6 Tab 3 to Appendix, #7 Tab 4 to Appendix, #8 Tab 5 to Appendix, #9 Tab 6 to Appendix, #10 Tab 7 to Appendix, #11 Tab 8 to Appendix, #12 Tab 9 to Appendix, #13 Tab 10 to Appendix, #14 Tab 11 to Appendix, #15 Tab 12 to Appendix, #16 Tab 13 to Appendix, #17 Tab 14 to Appendix, #18 Tab 15 to Appendix, #19 Tab 16 to Appendix, #20 Tab 17 to Appendix, #21 Tab 18 to Appendix, #22 Tab 19 to Appendix, #23 Tab 20 to Appendix, #24 Tab 21 to Appendix, #25 Tab 22 to Appendix, #26 Tab 23 to Appendix, #27 Tab 24 to Appendix, #28 Tab 25 to Appendix, #29 Tab 26 to Appendix, #30 Tab 27 to Appendix, #31 Tab 28 to Appendix, #32 Tab 29 to Appendix, #33 Tab 30 to Appendix, #34 Tab 31 to Appendix, #35 Tab 32 to Appendix, #36 Tab 33 to Appendix, #37 Tab 38 to Appendix, #38 Tab 39 to Appendix, #39 Tab 40 to Appendix, #40 Tab 41 to Appendix, #41 Tab 42 to Appendix, #42 Tab 43 to Appendix, #43 Tab 44 to Appendix, #44 Tab 45 to Appendix, #45 Tab 46 to Appendix, #46 Tab 50 to Appendix, #47 Tab 53 to Appendix, #48 Tab 55 to Appendix)(Reck, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sloss v. Tyson Fresh Meats | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tyson Fresh Meats | |
Represented By: | Erika Lauren Bertrand |
Represented By: | Espnola F. Cartmill |
Represented By: | Michael R Reck |
Represented By: | Erika Lauren Bauer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Sloss | |
Represented By: | Marlon Mormann |
Represented By: | Michael J. Carroll |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.