Tschopp et al v. Credence Resource Management, LLC et al
Charles Tschopp and Elena Tschopp |
Credence Resource Management, LLC and AT&T Mobility, LLC |
4:2018cv00310 |
September 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Helen C Adams |
John A Jarvey |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ***TEXT*** ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer AT&T Mobility, LLC. Defendant's answer is due on 11/29/2018. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 11/6/2018. (imk) Modified on 11/7/2018 (vr). |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead by AT&T Mobility, LLC.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. (Moser, Joseph) |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. An In-Person Scheduling Conference shall be held on 11/27/2018 at 9:30 AM before Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams in Room 420 at the Des Moines Courthouse. The parties shall file a proposed scheduling order and discovery plan as provided under L.R. 16 by 11/21/2018. (k) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure/Statement of Interest by Credence Resource Management, LLC. (Lange, Lance) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Credence Resource Management, LLC.(Lange, Lance) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure/Statement of Interest by AT&T Mobility, LLC. (Moser, Joseph) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph F Moser on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC (Moser, Joseph) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: ORDER granting #7 plaintiff's motion to extend time to file an answer for AT&T Mobility, LLC. Defendant shall have to and including 11/8/2018 to move or plead in response to the Complaint. Plaintiff's counsel should provide a copy of this order to defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/11/2018.(kln) |
Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer For Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC by Charles Tschopp, Elena Tschopp.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. (Marks, Samuel) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lance W. Lange on behalf of Credence Resource Management, LLC (Lange, Lance) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: ORDER granting #4 motion to extend time to file answer for Credence Resource Management, LLC. Defendant Credence Resource Management shall have to and including 10/26/2018. Counsel for plaintiff should forward a copy of this order to counsel for this defendant. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/4/2018.(kln) |
Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer For Defendant Credence Resource Management, LLC by Charles Tschopp, Elena Tschopp.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. (Marks, Samuel) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elena Tschopp, Charles Tschopp. AT&T Mobility, LLC served on 9/21/2018, answer due 10/12/2018. (Marks, Samuel) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elena Tschopp, Charles Tschopp. Credence Resource Management, LLC served on 9/21/2018, answer due 10/12/2018. (Marks, Samuel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Mobility, LLC, Credence Resource Management, LLC Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0863-3600972., filed by Elena Tschopp, Charles Tschopp. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 12/18/2018. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 12/18/2018.(Marks, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.