Putco, Inc. v. Shenzhen Aurora Technology Co., Ltd.

Plaintiff: Putco, Inc.
Defendant: Shenzhen Aurora Technology Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 4:2019cv00054
Filed: February 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
0 Judge: Robert W Pratt
1 Judge: Ross A Walters(R)
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shenzhen Aurora Technology Co., Ltd. Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0863-3735895., filed by Putco, Inc.. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 5/16/2019. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 5/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. 9,995,473)(Johnson, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Putco, Inc. v. Shenzhen Aurora Technology Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Putco, Inc.
Represented By: R Scott Johnson
Represented By: Nicholas Krob
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shenzhen Aurora Technology Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?